Which states report sewage spills to the EPA?
Only about half of US states currently send sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) data to EPA's national ECHO database. That is why so much of the map is hatched. A blank state does not mean no spills — it almost always means the state isn't electronically reporting overflows to EPA yet.
Is a blank state breaking federal law?
Short answer: no — that would overstate it. Three different duties sit with three different parties, and it's easy to conflate them:
- The overflow itself. A sanitary sewer overflow that reaches a waterway is generally an illegal, unpermitted discharge under the Clean Water Act. That part is real.
- Utility → state. A utility must report a health- or environment-endangering overflow to its state permitting authority, typically within 24 hours (40 CFR 122.41). Failing to is a permit violation by the utility — not the state.
- State → EPA. National data only appears when a state electronically transmits it to EPA under the NPDES e-Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 127). Sewer-overflow reports are the last phase (“Phase 2”), with a compliance deadline around December 2025 and EPA-granted extensions. A blank state is usually still standing up that feed — a phase-in gap, not clear illegality.
So a low ECHO count can mean genuinely fewer spills, a state that doesn't transmit to EPA yet, or utilities not reporting to the state — and ECHO alone can't tell them apart. The GAO has found EPA's national compliance data broadly incomplete, and EPA's own sewer-overflow dataset carries a caveat that it “does not represent all” events.
States with data (22)
Counts reflect reported events. Four states we ingest directly from the state agency, which is why their coverage is far deeper than raw ECHO.
| State | Events | Reached water | How we get it |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 72,702 | 10,747 | California CIWQS ↗ |
| Maryland | 30,714 | 0 | Maryland MDE ↗ |
| New York | 14,394 | 13,338 | New York DEC ↗ |
| North Carolina | 3,210 | 2,792 | North Carolina DWR ↗ |
| Illinois | 1,356 | 1 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Georgia | 908 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Puerto Rico | 646 | 12 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Arizona | 264 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Mississippi | 239 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Rhode Island | 212 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| South Dakota | 177 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| New Hampshire | 169 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Nebraska | 133 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| District of Columbia | 126 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Alaska | 43 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Kentucky | 43 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Washington | 35 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Massachusetts | 9 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Texas | 8 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Idaho | 1 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| Minnesota | 1 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
| New Mexico | 1 | 0 | EPA ECHO ↗ |
States with little or no data (30)
Whether each state has a plan to report SSOs to EPA, and when — from a state-by-state review of NPDES e-Reporting Rule status. “Not found” means we couldn't confirm a public commitment, not that none exists.
| State | Permitting agency | Plan to report? | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Alabama DEM (ADEM) ↗ | Own system (not in ECHO) | Unknown |
| Arkansas | Arkansas DEQ ↗ | Own system (not in ECHO) | Unknown |
| Colorado | Colorado DPHE (CDPHE) ↗ | Committed | TBD |
| Connecticut | Connecticut DEEP ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Delaware | Delaware DNREC ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Florida | Florida DEP (FDEP) ↗ | Own system (not in ECHO) | Unknown |
| Hawaii | Hawaii DOH (Clean Water Branch) ↗ | Committed | TBD |
| Indiana | Indiana DEM (IDEM) ↗ | Committed | TBD |
| Iowa | Iowa DNR ↗ | Committed | TBD |
| Kansas | Kansas DHE (KDHE) ↗ | Not found | Unknown |
| Louisiana | Louisiana DEQ ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Maine | Maine DEP ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Michigan | Michigan EGLE ↗ | Committed | Dec 2026 |
| Missouri | Missouri DNR ↗ | Committed | ~2025 |
| Montana | Montana DEQ ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Nevada | Nevada DEP (NDEP) ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| New Jersey | New Jersey DEP ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| North Dakota | North Dakota DEQ ↗ | Committed | Unknown |
| Ohio | Ohio EPA ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma DEQ ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Oregon | Oregon DEQ ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania DEP ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| South Carolina | South Carolina DES ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Tennessee | Tennessee DEC (TDEC) ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Utah | Utah DEQ (DWQ) ↗ | Not found | Unknown |
| Vermont | Vermont DEC ↗ | Committed | TBD |
| Virginia | Virginia DEQ ↗ | Committed | TBD |
| West Virginia | West Virginia DEP ↗ | Committed | TBD |
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin DNR ↗ | Committed | Dec 2028 |
| Wyoming | Wyoming DEQ (WYPDES) ↗ | Not found | Unknown |
Sources
- EPA — NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 127) and Phase 2 extension (Federal Register, 2015 & 2020).
- eCFR — 40 CFR 122.41 (standard NPDES permit conditions).
- EPA ECHO — Sewer Overflow / Bypass download summary (dataset completeness caveat).
- GAO-21-290 — Clean Water Act NPDES data completeness.
- Individual state environmental-agency e-reporting pages (per row).
This page is informational, not legal advice. State reporting status changes over time; verify a specific state before relying on it.